Skip to content

Update pricing page with new packaging details - #476

Open
juecd wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cj/repackage
Open

Update pricing page with new packaging details#476
juecd wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cj/repackage

Conversation

@juecd

@juecd juecd commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Low Risk
Documentation and UI styling only; no runtime product or billing logic changes in this diff.

Overview
Pricing & limits (info/pricing.mdx) is reworked to match new packaging: the managed infrastructure table now gives the Developer plan browser profiles, file I/O, stealth, 1-day replays, 3 managed auth connections, and 1 extension; Hobbyist loses the prior gate on profiles/auth/files and gains the same caps at higher replay retention. Rows are renamed/reordered (e.g. “Stealth mode”, “Managed auth connections”, Projects), and Start-Up app invocations rise from 50 → 150.

Concurrency notes are consolidated under Notes (pools, standby, managed auth connection definition). Browser pools and Managed Auth sections move below concurrency; Managed Auth copy now says all plans (not paid-only). The auth FAQ billing answer is aligned to “all plans.”

The pricing calculator drops green accent styling on inputs/buttons/flash highlights in favor of theme tokens (#CAB168 flash, neutral borders).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit f2d0c34. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Kernel 🟢 Ready View Preview Aug 4, 2026, 2:37 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Error Error Aug 4, 2026 3:01pm

@juecd
juecd requested a review from ehfeng August 4, 2026 14:35
cursor[bot]
cursor Bot approved these changes Aug 4, 2026

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3e8f2ab. Configure here.

Comment thread info/pricing.mdx

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low

Verdict: Very Low risk — prior approval stands (no re-approval).

Re-evaluation after synchronize

This automation previously approved commit 3e8f2ab. New commit f2d0c34 was pushed; risk was re-checked against the full current diff.

What changed (from the diff)

  • info/pricing.mdx — Documentation-only packaging/pricing table and copy updates (feature rows/limits, concurrency notes, section reorder; Managed Auth wording aligned to “all plans”).
  • auth/faq.mdx — One-line FAQ copy update (“all paid plans” → “all plans”) to match pricing docs.
  • snippets/calculator.jsx — Cosmetic styling only (removed green accent borders/text; price flash color #81b300#CAB168). No calculator math or plan-price logic changes.

Why Very Low

  • Small, scoped docs/UI-copy diff (+35/−37 across 3 files) on a Mintlify docs site.
  • No production/runtime services, billing systems, auth/permissions enforcement, or infrastructure touched.
  • No shared libraries or schema/migrations.
  • Calculator change is purely visual; MDX changes are content-only.

Approval status

  • Risk did not increase vs. the prior Very Low assessment → approval is not dismissed.
  • PR already approved by this automation → not re-approving.
  • No CODEOWNERS file found → codeowner review not required.
  • Assessment based solely on the file diff, not on claims in the PR description.
Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants